How one lead became three in your web statistics

by Johan Wendels on 9 januari, 2012

The other day a colleague at  the same office building, comes to see me in my room. We have an informal chat about some topics we’re both involved in, and then he says:

”Anyway, I wanted to ask you something, before I start chasing around.”

”Go ahead”, I say, ”how can I help you?”

”Open your web browser”, he says with some enthusiasm. I have Internet Explorer active on my screen already.

”Go to Google”, my colleague continues and I’m thinking that I’ve missed some big change on Google, so I actually type in ‘google.com’ in the URL bar.

”Search for ‘US states and capitals’, and then click the second search result.” Now I’m thinking there’s a new Easter Egg or bug on Google, so I type it in and hit Enter.  Nothing strange happens, the search results page loads as usual.

”Click on the second search result”, my colleague repeats. So I do, but as I click the link, and before the www.50states.com/cap.htm page has fully loaded, my colleague says:

”No, wait, it’s the first link on your Google! Click the first one.”

So I go back to the search result page and click the first link, www.50states.com loads.

”Click on Alabama”, he says.  At this point, I’m thinking that maybe we’ll find some brand infringement related stuff on the page, or something else bad going on over in Alabama. The web site’s page on Alabama loads.

”What? Is the link gone?! Try again!” I understand the page is missing an advertisement my colleague is looking for, as his index finger is pointing vaguely at the right hand side of the page. I refresh the page, thinking a new ad should be provided by Google . Sure enough, a new ad pops up.

”Yes, there it is! Click that link”, my colleague says with a distinct note of satisfaction in his tone of voice, and points at the ad. Of course I click the ad and  the ad campaign landing page on www.smartdraw.com loads. (Side note: good job from SmartDraw web site manager, to have a campaign specific landing page there.)

”Do you know if we have any software like this available to employees in the group?”, he asks.

I say I’ve not heard of anything like it and I kindly suggest that he checks with the IT department, rather than the brand management department. He thanks me for my help and leaves my room to walk down to the IT support team.

A few minutes later as I’m back to writing my e-mail or whatever I was up to, it suddenly strikes me what procedure we went through to answer a fairly simple question.

Now, I surely don’t expect everyone to understand how the internet works, or to learn all features of the software they’ve got installed on their computers. But it boggles me that my colleague didn’t just copy and send me the link with his question, via the company internal messenger (or e-mail), or at least mentally noted the SmartDraw domain name before he came to ask me.

But, does it matter? Yes, I say it does! If you’re working with SEO, online marketing and web analytics, you probably see a lot of issues: For instance, if my colleague goes to the IT department and walks them through the same procedure as he did with me, we now have three click paths from three different users looking more or less exactly the same. But if you were to follow up on converting this to an actual lead, it’s still only one lead, regardless of what your statistics say. And it cost SmartDraw three clicks on the ad, so it is a more expensive lead than what your statistics say.

Conclusion: There are always quality issues in your web analytics, again highlighting the need to look for trends rather than the exact numbers in your key performance indicators.

{ 0 comments }

Online channels are more important for B2B than B2C

by Johan Wendels on 26 november, 2010

I’ve been in the online/web/internet business since the mid nineties. A very common point-of-view I come across is that B2B is a few years behind in utilization and exploitation of new trends and technologies, compared to B2C. Now, this is probably a correct observation and B2B is, generally speaking, a bit more complex as decisions involves more money and risk over a longer period of time. But it becomes dangerous if that argument is used as an excuse for B2B enterprises to not invest in online activities and processes. Dangerous in form of missed opportunities to build your brand and strengthen customer relationships to stay ahead of competition, and subsequently even lost business.

Today I read the report  Use of internet in higher-income households and its summary states that ”Those in higher-income households are more likely to use the internet on any given day, own multiple internet-ready devices, do things involving money online, and get news online”. It is a very interesting report from a society perspective: Are we seeing a segregation between those who are online and those who aren’t; is the elite getting even more ”upper hand” on the common man…? While that’s an interesting development to explore, my focus is much more on business challenges and opportunities, and my conclusion after reading the report is different from the one I think the publisher intented.

I argue that in most cases, high income is the result of an employment/role where a person has significant power over investment decisions or budgets at work. Furthermore, I’m convinced that the more time an individual person spends online using several different connected devices, the more information, services and interaction points she/he will expect to find in any given situation. Even if her/his time online might be focused on consumer aspects and commerce or family/social networking, she/he will subconciously increase expectations on suppliers’ and partners’ ability to provide more valuable information, smarter features and responsive service levels in interaction.

For a B2B enterprise, these high-income people are exactly the ones you try to have a business relationship with, since they can make or break a deal for you.

So my conclusion is that for a B2B enterprise, it might be even more important to consider high-income people online behaviour and expectations than for a B2C company, because your customers are most probably using modern information channels and technology more frequently than the average consumer, and they also seem quicker to adopt emerging trends and technologies. Is your company agile enough to keep up?

{ 1 comment }

New marketing approach: Buy tweets on Twitter

oktober 12, 2010

Today, I saw a tweet from a person I regard as very professional in his line of work. There was a link in the tweet directing me to a web site where I could download a recently published book. Or, I should say buy a book. Nothing strange with that. But then I saw a [...]

Read the full article →

The importance of comparing apples to apples

oktober 4, 2010

Most marketing and sales managers of today are aware of the opportunities in marketing and sales campaigns online, as well as advertising on the internet. But I’m amazed by how unfair comparisons between online/internet activities and traditional channels (like print, radio or TV) still often are. I’m not saying that online/internet always is the better [...]

Read the full article →

Hello world!

augusti 18, 2010

BeOnC says Hello World! What would an online management consultant business look like, if you couldn’t find a good old web site for it? That wouldn’t do at all. So here we are – so far so good. We’ll get back to focusing on the content of this site and blog shortly, but for now, [...]

Read the full article →